Cases 51 - 60 of 72
Zigmont v. Holder et al
as 1:2011cv00022
Plaintiff:
James Steven Zigmont
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr. , William J. Ihlenfeld, II , Douglas H Shulman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plumb v. United States of America et al
as 2:2011cv03015
Plaintiff:
Carl H Plumb
Defendant:
United States of America , Eric H Holder, Jr, Michael C Ormsby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mason v. Holder et al
as 2:2011cv02099
Plaintiff:
Michael Darrow Mason
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Bill Haslam, Douglas H. Shulman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marinelli v. Grimes et al (MAG+)
as 2:2011cv00096
Plaintiff:
Robert Marinelli
Defendant:
Jim Grimes, Douglas H. Shulman and United States
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426
Puccini v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2011cv00771
Petitioner:
Steve Puccini
Respondent:
The United States of America and Douglas H. Shulman
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Dadgar et al v. United States of America et al
as 4:2010mc80282
Petitioner:
Arezou Dadgar and Angels Hospice, LLC
Respondent:
United States of America, Douglas H. Shulman and Randy Krueger
Pedersen et al v. Office of Personnel Management et al
as 3:2010cv01750
Plaintiff:
Joanne Pedersen , Ann Meitzen , Gerald V. Passaro, II and others
Defendant:
Office of Personnel Management, Timothy F. Geithner, Michael J. Astrue and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Abdun-Noor et al v. Katz et al
as 3:2010cv04627
Plaintiff:
Mo'Min Abdun-Noor and Susie Ann Lucas
Defendant:
Mitchell A Katz, Benjamin Rosenfield, James Smothers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Olvany v. Shulman
as 4:2010cv02087
Plaintiff:
Dean P. Olvany
Defendant:
Douglas H. Shulman
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Z STREET v. SHULMAN
as 2:2010cv04307
Plaintiff:
Z STREET
Defendant:
DOUGLAS H. SHULMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
