Cases 51 - 60 of 30,777
FANN v. HARRY et al
as 2:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
GREGORY D. FANN, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr LAUREL R. HARRY, ERIC ARMEL, TINA WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Rupesh Chaturvedi v. RamanID, Inc.
as 2:2024cv04306
Plaintiff:
Dr. Rupesh Chaturvedi
Defendant:
RamanID, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
USA v. Sardar Ashrafkhan
as 24-1452
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SARDAR ASHRAFKHAN, aka Sardar Khan, (Dr. Khan)
Moore v. Hodge, et al
as 24-1230
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR MOORE
Defendant:
DR. HODGE, (CSP), MARSHALL GRIFFITH, (CSP) and WARDEN LITTLE
Hill v. Mann et al
as 4:2024cv03090
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant:
Dr. Mann, Dr. Terique and Fennie Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Illinois Department of Public Health
as 1:2024cv04213
Plaintiff:
Dr. Kenneth Campbell
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Public Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Coleman v. Onuoha et al
as 9:2024cv03158
Plaintiff:
Stye L. Coleman
Defendant:
Dr. Onuoha and Ms. Sinclair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kenneth ThorntonIn re: Kenneth Thornton
as 24-1941
Petitioner:
In re: KENNETH E. THORNTON
Respondent:
BEAVER COUNTY DETECTIVES OFFICE, in her official capacity, PETER CARBONE, in his individual and official capacity, MARLENE EVERETTE, in her individual and official capacity and others
Defendant:
LISA JONES, in her individual capacity and SHARON D. BUCKLEY, in her individual capacity
Babatunde Reuben v. Jason Ziemer, et al
as 24-2063
Plaintiff:
Babatunde A. Reuben
Defendant:
Dr. Jason A. Ziemer, Park Dental Maplewood, UCare Minnesota and others
Owens, Kevin v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv21941
Plaintiff:
Kevin M Owens
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Warden Acosta, Warden Lamb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
