Cases 51 - 60 of 17,284
Brunner v. City of Payson Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Donald Earl Brunner
Defendant:
City of Payson Police Department, FNU Gille, J. Goode and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKinney v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00182
Petitioner:
James Earl Dayshawn Depree McKinney
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hutcherson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02988
Plaintiff:
Earl Hutcherson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Earl v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02958
Plaintiff:
David Earl
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Earl Dowty v. Brent Fluke, et al
as 24-2084
Petitioner:
Earl D. Dowty
Respondent:
Brent Fluke, Warden and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
BARKER v. R. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv06432
Petitioner:
BRANDON EARL BARKER
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Andrews v. Well Path et al
as 4:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Donald S Andrews, Jr
Defendant:
Well Path, Corrective Care Solutions, Wendy Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell v. Bell
as 24-1390
Plaintiff:
AKO K. BURRELL
Defendant:
EARL BELL, Superintendent CCF, WEBB, Education Supervisor of CCF, KING, Deputy Superintendent of Programs and others
Dodge et al v. Doe Creek Farm, Inc.
as 7:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Earl Dodge and Lauren Sheehan
Defendant:
Doe Creek Farm, Inc. doing business as Doe Creek Farm doing business as The Bad Apple
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
