Cases 51 - 60 of 22,558
Eugene William Hillman v. Warden
as 5:2024cv01175
Petitioner:
Eugene William Hillman
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Eugene Bowermaster v. Corporal Luis et al
as 2:2024cv04832
Plaintiff:
Charles Eugene Bowermaster
Defendant:
Corparal Luis and Deputy Navarette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) James v. Sacramento County Superior Court
as 2:2024cv01585
Plaintiff:
Ronald Eugene James
Defendant:
Sacramento County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRYGA v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00841
Petitioner:
EUGENE GRYGA
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Smith v. Solorzano
as 2:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Darrell Eugene Smith
Defendant:
R. Solorzano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beadle v. Rardin
as 0:2024cv02045
Petitioner:
Jack Eugene Beadle
Respondent:
Jared Rardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pena v. Stevens Transport, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03887
Plaintiff:
Maria Checo Pena
Defendant:
Stevens Transport, Inc. and Eugene Kritzer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
US v. Eugene Watkins
as 24-6523
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
EUGENE ROBERT WATKINS
Bergenske v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2024cv01277
Plaintiff:
Terry Eugene Bergenske
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
STOCKTON et al v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON, ANTHONY TILLMAN, MICHAEL FIGUEROA and others
Defendant:
LAUREL R. HARRY, GEORGE LITTLE, S. SHAFFER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
