Cases 51 - 60 of 81
Perales v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv00957
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, Vulcan Inc, William Henry Gates, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERALES et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2012cv00704
Plaintiff:
AZAEL DYTHIAN PERALES, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and DANIEL KEN "DAN&q INOUYE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. PENTAGON, U.S. SECRET SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAVERGNE v. BRYSON et al
as 3:2011cv07117
Plaintiff:
EUGENE MARTIN LAVERGNE
Defendant:
JOHN BRYSON, JOHN GROVER, KAREN L. HAAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Adams v Tyson Foods Inc et al
as 2:2011cv02285
Plaintiff:
Dale B Adams
Defendant:
Tyson Foods Inc, Leland E Tollett, Albert C Zapanta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHOI v. BOND et al
as 1:2011cv02002
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CHOI
Defendant:
BRIAN K. BOND, VALERIE JARRETT, JAMES MESSINA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Daley v. Micieli et al
as 2:2011cv02010
Plaintiff:
Dameon Daley
Defendant:
J Micieli, G Kizziah, J P Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Buggs v. GMAC Mortgage LLC et al
as 4:2011cv00641
Defendant:
GMAC Mortgage LLC , US Bank National Association , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Marzetta Buggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Dale Adams v. Tyson Foods, et al
as 11-3180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dale Brent Adams
Defendant - Appellee:
Tyson Foods, Inc., Leland E. Tollett, Exec, Albert C. Zapanta, Exec and others
INOUYE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv53323
Plaintiff:
ROY M INOUYE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Janis Cowser v. Barack Obama, et al
as 11-17055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANIS COWSER
Defendant - Appellee:
BARACK OBAMA, JOE BIDEN, THOMAS J. VILSACK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
