Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 73
Tejeda v. Trump et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00079
Plaintiff: Junior Tejeda
Defendant: Donald Trump, Mike Pence, Mike Pompeo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clancy v. Mattis
as 6:2018cv03016
Plaintiff: Jenita Clancy
Defendant: James N. Mattis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv03003
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
The City of New York et al v. The United States Department of Defense et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01464
Defendant: Heather A. Wilson, The United States Department of Defense, The United States Department of the Navy and others
Plaintiff: The City and County of San Francisco, The City of New York and The City of Philadelphia
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv03742
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00528
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Yaroshefsky v. Mattis et al
as 1:2017cv08718
Petitioner: Ellen Yaroshefsky
Respondent: James N. Mattis and Vance H. Spath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BECKER v. MATTIS et al
as 1:2017cv02336
Respondent: JAMES N. MATTIS , RICHARD V. SPENCER and JAMES W. CRAWFORD
Petitioner: CRAIG R. BECKER
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Mandamus
KAMMEN v. MATTIS et al
as 1:2017cv03951
Petitioner: RICHARD KAMMEN
Respondent: GEN. JAMES N. MATTIS, HARVEY RISHIKOF and COL. VANCE SPATH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv13319
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?