Cases
Cases 51 - 59 of 59
Davis v. Gusman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv03221
Plaintiff: Nolan C. Davis, Sr.
Defendant: Marlin Gusman, Marlin Gusman, Joe Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCLAIN v. FINNEN et al
as 2:2008cv00192
Plaintiff: JOE HOWARD MCCLAIN
Defendant: ALAN FINNEN, PENNY ADAM and JIM WYNN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shelter General Insurance Company v. Howard et al
as 4:2008cv00279
Plaintiff: Shelter General Insurance Company
Defendant: Joe Howard and Choice Arrowood
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Both
Howard v. Lyda et al
as 3:2008cv00017
Plaintiff: Joe Howard
Defendant: Debbie Lyda and Lois Manus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. Eupora Family Medical Clinic We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00018
Plaintiff: Joe Howard
Defendant: Eupora Family Medical Clinic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Gusman et al
as 2:2008cv00574
Plaintiff: Don Davis
Defendant: Marlin Gusman, Marlin Gusman, Rudy Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ABRAHAM et al v. A.C. and S., Inc., et al
as 2:2007cv66201
Plaintiff: DENOTA ABRAHAM, JEROME D. ACKLIN, RUTHIE ACKLIN and others
Receiver: BRUCE CARMAN
Defendant: A.C. AND S. INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), A.P. GREEIN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MCCLAIN v. FINNEN
as 2:2007cv00123
Petitioner: JOE HOWARD MCCLAIN
Respondent: ALAN FINNEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aaberg, et al v. Equitec Financl Grp., et al
as 3:1991cv02926
Plaintiff: Ray Bouchey, Carol A. Cherbitsky, Charles W. Emery, Jr. and others
Defendant: William Peressini, Equitec Securities Corporation, Equitec Financial Group, Inc. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?