Cases 51 - 60 of 1,127
Smith v. State of Washington
as 3:2023cv00252
Petitioner:
John Garrett Smith
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fantel v. Brutinel et al
as 2:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
John Fantel
Defendant:
Robert Brutinel, Pamela Sue Frasher Gates, Doug Ducey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. John Smith, II
as 23-30036
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN PEARL SMITH II
Johansen et al v. Myers et al
as 1:2023cv00006
Counter Defendant:
Lance Johansen and Mississippi Orthopedic Institute, PLLC
Defendant:
Phillip Myers, Paula Smith, John D. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Glass v. John Peter Smith Hospital et al
as 4:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Edward Benton Glass
Defendant:
John Peter Smith Hospital, FNU Shaw, All Nurse Practicioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Thrasher
as 3:2023cv05013
Petitioner:
John Garrett Smith
Respondent:
Thrasher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. GRAND VILLA OF DELRAY BEACH EAST
as 2:2023cv14026
Plaintiff:
John B. Smith
Defendant:
GRAND VILLA OF DELRAY BEACH EAST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
USA v. Smith
as 23-10101
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
John Darren Smith
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv04207
Plaintiff:
John W. Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Smith v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2022pq02991
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
John Wayne Smith
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
