Cases 51 - 60 of 166
Martin v. Law Office of Daniel M. Keil, P.A. et al
as 1:2019cv22037
Defendant:
Daniel M. Keil and Law Office of Daniel M. Keil, P.A.
Plaintiff:
Miosoty Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
KEIL et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv06717
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
STEVEN R. KEIL and VICTORIA J. KEIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keil v. McCain et al
as 2:2018cv09410
Plaintiff:
Curtis Antoine Keil and Curtis Antione Keil
Defendant:
Sandy McCain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Boone v. Bowie County Texas et al
as 3:2018cv02438
Defendant:
Matt Keil, Michael Bernoudy, Tina Petty and others
Plaintiff:
Edward C Boone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MDG - RIO V Limited v. City of Seguin, Texas et al
as 5:2018cv00882
Plaintiff:
MDG - RIO V Limited
Defendant:
Don Keil and City of Seguin, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. O'Sullivan et al
as 3:2018cv00581
Defendant:
Jim O'Sullivan, Sgt. Withmore and Sgt. Keil
Plaintiff:
Skacey Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keil v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 2:2018cv12330
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Plaintiff:
Steven Keil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Brant et al v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2018cv01030
Plaintiff:
Robert Brant , Robert Watson , Robert Lewis-Jackson and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox v. United States of America
as 5:2018cv08014
Petitioner:
Valorie Keil Cox
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Keil v. MHM Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv06074
Plaintiff:
Karen Backues Keil
Defendant:
MHM Services, Inc. , John Dunn , John or Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
