Cases 51 - 60 of 62
CAMPAGNA v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. et al
as 2:2013cv02395
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CAMPAGNA, JR.
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. , LAWRENCE MARTIN, KATHLEEN MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Martin v. HSBC Bank USA National Association
as 2:2012cv15181
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Martin
Defendant:
HSBC Bank USA National Association
JONES v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2011cv00628
Plaintiff:
RODNEY E. JONES
Defendant:
ROBERT LEWIS, JONI P. PENNY, MIKE BALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Tubbs Rice Dryers Inc
as 3:2011cv00013
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Martin
Defendant:
Tubbs Rice Dryers Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen et al v. Allstate Insurance Company
as 2:2010cv03018
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Allen , Carolyn Allen , Ronald Bardell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lawrence Martin v. Ray Hobb
as 10-1888
Petitioner:
Lawrence Martin
Respondent:
Ray Hobbs, Interim Director Arkansas Department of Correction
United States of America v. Martin
as 2:2010mj30049
Defendant:
Lawrence Martin
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Edwards v. Denny et al
as 5:2009cv06141
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Martin Edwards
Defendant:
Larry Denny, Ronda Posh, Terry Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Robert Gilkison
as 09-2135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT V. GILKISON, PEIRCE, RAIMOND & COULTER, PC, a/k/a Robert Peirce & Associates, P.C., a Pennsylvania Professional Corporation, JOHN DOES and others
Party-in-Interest - None:
RICHARD CASSOFF, M.D.
Intervenor - None:
LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Amicus Supporting Appellant:
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS, AMERICAN TORT REFORM ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
