Cases 51 - 60 of 94
New York Metro Truck Inc. v. Greco et al
as 1:2013cv07203
Defendant:
Moises Acevedo, Almar Supplies, Inc., Renaldo Amorelli and others
Plaintiff:
New York Metro Truck Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Michael Bradley v. Jack Reno, Jr., et al
as 13-3983
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BRADLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK M. RENO, JR., TIMOTHY S. DOBBINS, TIMOTHY J. TIMBERLAKE and others
Mireles et al vs. City of Harlingen et al
as 1:2013cv00081
Plaintiff:
Denise Mireles and Jennifer Nino
Defendant:
City of Harlingen , City of Harlingen Police Department Dispatch , City of Harlingen Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bradley v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv08057
Plaintiff:
Michael Bradley
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
David Bradley v. Debra Sauers, et al
as 13-1503
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID MICHAEL BRADLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBRA SAUERS and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Robinson-Brown v. Cook County Municipality et al
as 1:2012cv09772
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Robinson-Brown
Defendant:
Cook County Municipality, Thomas Dart, Scott Michael Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRADLEY v. SAUERS et al
as 2:2012cv01218
Petitioner:
DAVID MICHAEL BRADLEY
Respondent:
DEBRA SAUERS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Glover v. USA
as 5:2012cv00508
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Bradley Glover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ireland v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00445
Plaintiff:
Michael Bradley Ireland
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
USA v. Michael Bradley
as 12-5736
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL BRADLEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
