Cases 51 - 60 of 7,165
GREENBERG v. MCEWEN et al
as 2:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
JASON H. GREENBERG and JASON GREENBERG
Defendant:
D. NEIL MCEWEN, BRUCE ROSA, DAVID MOYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mack v. Swartz et al
as 3:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mack
Defendant:
Adam Matthew Swartz, Ayinde Immanuel Ashford, Kerry P Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
United States of America v. Raniere
as 24-778
Defendant:
KEITH RANIERE, NANCY SALZMAN, Vanguard and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sarmad v. Mack Trucks, Inc. et al
as 7:2024cv00207
Defendant:
Dealers' Choice Truckaway System, Inc., Mack Trucks, Inc., Dealers and others
Plaintiff:
Ismael Sarmad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv10747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Mack v. Henderson et al
as 3:2024cv00709
Defendant:
Proficient Auto Transport, Inc., William Henderson, III and Proficient Auto, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Denovias Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Titus v. World Book et al
as 6:2024cv06039
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
World Book, Nike Distribution Centers, Craig Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Mack
as 24-40184
Plaintiff:
Lenny Leray Henderson
Defendant:
Andy Mack, Mayor, City of Longview, Robert Huhta, Chief, Longview Police Department, Matthew Cooper, Officer, Longview Police Department and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
