Cases 51 - 60 of 182
Miles v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2019cv14480
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Michael Keith Miles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lee v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2019cv00348
Petitioner:
Michael Keith Lee
Respondent:
TDCJ-CID Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PUTT v BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC et al
as 3:2019cv03696
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KEITH PUTT
Defendant:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC and BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Denny et al v. Ocean Marine Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00629
Defendant:
Kevin McLaughlin, Don Weston, Ocean Marine Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Courtney Denny and Kyle Denny
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Forrester v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2019cv01730
Defendant:
HSA Barnes, Dr. J Dunlop, Nurse Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Keith Forrester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Brown v. U.S. Department of Defense, et al
as 19-10856
Defendant / Appellee:
MESQUITE MUNICIPAL/GOVERNMENT, DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT, AT&T CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL KEITH BROWN
Brown v. First National Bank of Texas et al
as 3:2019cv01302
Defendant:
Speedy Cash, Homeland Security, US Treasury Dept and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Keith Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Henley v. United States
as 19-2084
Appellant:
Michael Keith Henley
Appellee:
United States of America
Brown v. US Department of Defense et al
as 3:2019cv01267
Defendant:
Town of Addison Texas, City of Dallas, Department of Treasury and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Keith Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Putt v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv10039
Plaintiff:
Michael Keith Putt
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
