Cases 51 - 60 of 156
Clarke v. N.Y.S. Division of Parole et al
as 1:2017cv10170
Plaintiff:
Steven P. Clarke
Defendant:
N.Y.S. Division of Parole, Orange County Jail, Jose Pabon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Clark et al
as 3:2017cv03440
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jeffrey P Clark and Cathy M Clark
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Clarke v. Ocera Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv06687
Plaintiff:
Samuel P. Clarke
Defendant:
Ocera Therapeutics, Inc., Eckard Weber, Linda Grais and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kareem of the Family Hodge v. Paxton et al
as 1:2017cv04509
Plaintiff:
Kareem of the Family Hodge
Defendant:
Warren Kenneth Paxton, Jr., Cathy P. Clark, Nueces County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keyes v. Groder et al
as 2:2017cv06434
Defendant:
Attorney James P Clarke, Judge S. M. Gianelli and Attorney Jeffrey Groder
Plaintiff:
Keysean L Keyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Minnesota Department of Correction
as 0:2017cv04905
Petitioner:
Carlos P Clark
Respondent:
Minnesota Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Keyes v. Adams et al
as 3:2017cv01769
Plaintiff:
Keysean L. Keyes
Defendant:
Thomas Adams, Christopher Quinn, Madeline Singas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keyes v. Clarke et al
as 2:2017cv06128
Defendant:
Judge Thomas Adam, Attorney James P Clarke, County Court Attorney Legal Aid and others
Plaintiff:
Keysean L Keyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bonelli v. Clark et al
as 4:2017cv00454
Petitioner:
Isaac Bonelli
Respondent:
James P Clark and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Clark v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
as 17-1912
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES A. CLARK and HELEN P. CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
