Cases 51 - 60 of 135
Underwood et al v. Arbitration Resolution Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01115
Defendant:
Prospect Funding Holdings, LLC, Prospect Funding Holdings (NY) II, LLC, Prospect Funding Holdings (NY), LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Edward S. Cook, P.C. and Robert R. Underwood, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Cook v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2018cv02917
Plaintiff:
Geofrey S Cook
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Daniels v. Cook, et al.
as 8:2018cv01833
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Daniels
Defendant:
Jeffrey S. Cook and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Cook et al v. Brown et al
as 6:2018cv01085
Defendant:
Governor Kate Brown, Director Katy Coba and Oregon American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees Council 75
Plaintiff:
Che' S. Cook, Clifford H. Elliott, J. Scott English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COOK v. WARDEN
as 3:2018cv00062
Miscellaneou:
BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
DEREK S. COOK
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Donald Mason v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2018cv00041
Defendant:
J. Arden, S. Cook, County of San Bernardino and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Mason
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Cook v. Diesel et al
as 2:2017cv00913
Plaintiff:
James S Cook
Defendant:
Vin Diesel, Rob Cohen, Neal H Moritz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Cook v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 3:2016cv06610
Plaintiff:
James S. Cook
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Banks v. Dart's Cook County Sheriff's
as 1:2016cv08984
Plaintiff:
Eddie Banks
Defendant:
Tom Dart's Cook County Sheriff's
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
