Cases 51 - 60 of 5,465
Johnson v. Penix et al
as 4:2024cv00647
Defendant:
Howard, Solomon, McJunkins and others
Plaintiff:
Larry L Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00543
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Sterling v. ACS (Administration for Children Services) et al
as 1:2024cv05936
Defendant:
ACS (Administration for Children Services), HRA (Human Resources Administration), City of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Rose Sterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
McGuire v. Hummer, et al.
as 4:2024cv00339
Defendant:
Officer Hummer and Idaho Falls Police Department
Plaintiff:
Sterling N McGuire
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-40421
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ag Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination (Age)
JB CUSTOM OFFSHORE RIGGING AND FISHING TACKLE INC. v. STERLING TACKLE LLC
as 2:2024cv06379
Plaintiff:
JB CUSTOM OFFSHORE RIGGING AND FISHING TACKLE INC. doing business as CHATTER LURES
Defendant:
STERLING TACKLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Sterling Computers Corporation v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00551
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sterling Computers Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 100 Patent Infringement
Hoard v. Texas Attorney General
as 3:2024cv01369
Defendant:
Tam Terry, Texas Attorney General, Carson County Commissioners Court and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Hoard, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kane v. Sackett Street Associates, LLC
as 24-1924
Plaintiff:
NICKIE KANE
Defendant:
SACKETT STREET ASSOCIATES, LLC and STERLING GROUP DEVELOPERS, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
