Cases 51 - 60 of 72
Helton v. Helton et al
as 5:2014mc01819
Appellant:
William Randall Helton
Appellee:
Stephen Helton and Sendy Helton
Miscellaneou:
Bankruptcy Clerk and Jack Caddell
Burnette v. Veterans Administration Healthcare, et al. (MAG+)
as 2:2014cv00660
Plaintiff:
William Randall Burnette
Defendant:
Veterans Administration Healthcare, VAMC Director and VMAC Police Chief
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RANDALL v. COLVIN
as 2:2014cv00838
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILLIAM RANDALL, JR.
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Burnette v. Forniss et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2014cv00407
Plaintiff:
William Randall Burnette
Defendant:
Leon Forniss, Luther Strange and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hayes et al v. Mantech International Corporation
as 1:2014cv00546
Plaintiff:
William Randall Hayes , Kent Nelson , Clinton Sawyer and others
Defendant:
Mantech International Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00947
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Hull v. Branding Ranch LLC
as 2:2013cv00904
Defendant:
Branding Ranch LLC
Plaintiff:
William Randall Hull
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
McKinney v. Oklahoma City City of et al
as 5:2013cv00337
Plaintiff:
William Randall McKinney
Defendant:
Oklahoma City City of , Oklahoma City Police Department , Phil Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RANDALL et al v. PFIZER INC et al
as 2:2012cv05615
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE RANDALL and WILLIAM RANDALL
Defendant:
PFIZER INC and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Randall et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 3:2012cv04669
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Randall and William Randall
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
