Cases 51 - 60 of 2,190
Urling v. State of Tennessee et al (JRG2)
as 1:2018cv00098
Plaintiff:
Ian Lancelot Urling
Defendant:
State of Tennessee and Coffee County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Burgos v. Suffolk County Sheriff's Department
as 1:2018cv10961
Plaintiff:
Luis Burgos
Defendant:
Suffolk County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Sumner County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2018cv00444
Plaintiff:
Sandi Jackson
Defendant:
Sumner County, Tennessee, Sumner County Sheriff's Department, Sonny Weatherford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Selvage v. Penzone et al
as 2:2018cv01434
Plaintiff:
Michael Ryan Selvage
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Sheriff's Department and Phoenix Durango Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turchi v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2018cv01436
Plaintiff:
Michele Jeannine Turchi
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Department and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hillygus et al. Doherty et al.
as 3:2018cv00212
Defendant:
2nd Judicial District Court, Chuck Allan, Jerry Baldridge and others
Plaintiff:
Debbie Hillygus, Herbert Eugene Hillygus, Roger Hillygus and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Williams v. Nugent et al
as 8:2018cv01125
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Defendant:
Richard Nugent, Richard Condray, Manuel Zurita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hamilton v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2018cv01375
Plaintiff:
Antwone DeWayne Hamilton
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
