Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 8,894
Ramos-Lopez v. US
as 24-1284
Plaintiff: ADRIAN RAMOS-LOPEZ
Defendant: UNITED STATES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01898
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dotson et al v. CG Roxanne, LLC
as 2:2024cv02567
Plaintiff: Michael Dotson, Tom M. Friedman and Adrian R. Bacon
Defendant: CG Roxanne, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Revilla Adrian v. Washington Metro Area Transit Authority et al
as 8:2024cv00911
Plaintiff: WILLY REVILLA ADRIAN
Defendant: The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority and STEVEN ANDREW WHITAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Dotson et al v. CG Roxanne, LLC
as 2:2024cv02521
Plaintiff: Michael Dotson, Todd M. Friedman and Adrian R. Bacon
Defendant: CG Roxanne, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
BETTER MADE SNACK FOODS, INC., v. IVP HOLDING, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv10783
Plaintiff: Better Made Snack Foods, Inc.
Defendant: IVP Holding, LLC a Michigan Limited Liability Company Doing business as House Brands Distro, Vinson Bahri, 1864 US-23, LLC Doing business as High Society 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Malan-Pesantez v. Garland
as 24-772
Petitioner: ANGEL RUBEN MALAN-PESANTEZ, ROSARIO ERNESTINA NAMINA-ORTEGA, KARINA ALEJANDRA MALAN-NAMINA and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-30188
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00724
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Mora v. Fuentes et al
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff: Jesse Mora
Defendant: Mary Fuentes, Adrian Munoz, Jerry Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?