Cases 61 - 70 of 908
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PIERRE v. KOLODZEIJ et al
as 3:2023cv12771
Plaintiff:
MARCAUREL A PIERRE
Defendant:
J KOLODZEIJ, COREY SETTLEMIRES, AARON M STEPHENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR et al v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00408
Plaintiff:
ARNETTE TAYLOR, CASSIUS CALDWELL, CHAD HERRING and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. and TMX FINANCE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Arnett v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv11138
Plaintiff:
Raphael Arnett
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
ARNETT v. LIFECELL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2023cv02525
Plaintiff:
KENNETH ARNETT
Defendant:
LIFECELL CORPORATION, ALLERGAN, INC., ALLERGAN USA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Arnett et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01417
Plaintiff:
JAN D. ARNETT and SHARON C. ARNETT
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Police v. Arnett
as 23-10419
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Michael Police
Defendant / Appellant:
David Arnett, Officer
Arnette v. Tire One, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01456
Plaintiff:
Clayton L.J.W. Arnette and Clayton Arnette
Defendant:
Tire One, LLC and Jamie Burns Humphries
Arnett v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corp. et al
as 3:2023cv20981
Plaintiff:
Carl Arnett
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corp., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15432
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
