Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 203
In re: Arizona Theranos Incorporated Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv02138
Plaintiff: Toy and Kimberly Toy
Defendant: Theranos Incorporated, Ramesh Balwani, Walgreens Boots Alliance Incorporated and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: R.C., L.T., B.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Brown v. Pennock et al
as 4:2016cv04123
Plaintiff: Bobby Brown
Defendant: Wanda Pennock, Greg Scott, Joesph Hankins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Theranos, Inc.
as 5:2016cv03454
Plaintiff: Bobbie Brown
Defendant: Theranos, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Coyne et al
as 1:2016cv02284
Plaintiff: Bobby Brown
Defendant: Daniel Coyne, Matthew Daniels and Michael Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bobby Brown v. Eugene McAdory, et al
as 15-3811
Plaintiff - Appellant: BOBBY BROWN
Defendant - Appellee: EUGENE MCADORY, J. HANKINS, J. F. CARAWAY and others
Brown v. Scott et al
as 4:2015cv04208
Plaintiff: Bobby Brown
Defendant: Greg Scott, K. Winter, Joe Hankins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrison et al v. Brown et al
as 4:2015cv00660
Plaintiff: Billy Garrison , Michael Cox and Sammie Brewer
Defendant: Bobby Brown , John Randall and Johnny Fowlkes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beal et al v. Augusta, City of et al
as 2:2015cv00154
Plaintiff: Kenny Beal and Amber Beal
Defendant: Augusta, City of , Jon Ford , Dewitt Fortune and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chariell Glaze v. Karl Byrd, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-2271
Plaintiff - Appellant: Chariell Ali Glaze
Defendant - Appellee: Karl Byrd, Sheriff, Faulkner County, Bobby Brown, Major, Faulkner County Sheriff's Office, John Randall, Captain, Faulkner County Sheriff's Office and others
In re: Bobby Brown
as 15-10446
Movant: In re: BOBBY BROWN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?