Cases 61 - 70 of 85
Adams v. Cousin et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00010
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Wexford Health Care, Officer Contrell and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Babers et al (INMATE 1)(MEMBER)
as 2:2019cv00016
Defendant:
Mr. Boyd, Mary Collins, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Richie et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00012
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Wexford Health Care, Captain Lamar and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdurahman et al v. Alexandria Hyundai, LLC, et al
as 3:2014cv00002
Plaintiff:
Alim Abdurahman, John Abel, Lena Abel and others
Defendant:
Alexandria Hyundai, LLC, Brown's Leesburg Hyundai, LLC, Brown's Manassas Hyundai, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams v. Adams et al
as 3:2018cv00181
Plaintiff:
Jamie Brandon Adams
Defendant:
Betty Jane Aswell Adams and Amanda Hollis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv09130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Jeffus et al v. Ovation Health Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01072
Defendant:
RHC Operations, Inc., John Doe, Gena Turner and others
Plaintiff:
Tracie Caldwell, Mary Frazier, Toni Greenlee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Adams v. Genovese
as 1:2017cv00098
Petitioner:
M. Brandon Adams
Respondent:
Kevin Genovese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dauntain v. Bishop, et al
as 8:2017cv02962
Petitioner:
Brandon Adam Dauntain
Respondent:
Frank B. Bishop Jr. and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parr et al v. Directv, LLC et al
as 0:2017cv03424
Defendant:
Directv, LLC, Multiband Field Services, Inc., Multiband Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Parr , Jeffery Adams , Todd Frank and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.