Cases 61 - 70 of 119
JONES v. SMITH
as 2:2016cv00468
Petitioner:
DEMETRIUS JONES
Respondent:
BRYAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SIMS v. SMITH
as 2:2016cv00458
Petitioner:
GREGORY SIMS
Respondent:
BRYAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas Ingrassia v. Unknown Kim, et al
as 16-4110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Thomas J. Ingrassia
Defendant:
Keith Schafer, Felix Vincenz, Julie Inman and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Unknown Kim, Psychiatrist/Physician, SORTS, in her individual capacity, Ron Moore, RN, SORTS, in his official and individual capacity, Kaylynn Reed, RN, SORTS, in her official and individual capacity and others
Appellee:
Robert Dolan
Joseph Zickes v. Cuyahoga County, et al
as 16-4180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH ZICKES
Defendant - Appellee:
CUYAHOGA COUNTY, CUYAHOGA COUNTY EXECUTIVE, BRYAN SMITH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05650
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
IN THE MATTER OF Gerald Bryan Smith # -152127
as 3:2016mc80178
Respondent:
Gerald Bryan Smith
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Intercept Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv00144
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Defendant:
Intercept Corporation , Bryan Smith and Craig Dresser
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 3410
Zurich American Insurance Company v. Hash et al
as 1:2016cv01537
Plaintiff:
Zurich American Insurance Company
Defendant:
Gary Rex Hash, Delton Holt, Jerrel Heatwole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Tony Bryan Smith v. Harold Clarke
as 16-6525
Petitioner - Appellant:
TONY BRYAN SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE
Ismail v. Cooper et al
as 7:2015cv00234
Plaintiff:
Faisal Ismail
Defendant:
Jasmine Cooper, Jasmine's Boyfrinds, Debbie Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
