Cases 61 - 70 of 112
United States of America v. Miscellaneous Jewelry and Precious Items et al
as 2:2014cv02245
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Miscellaneous Jewelry and Precious Items, Miscellaneous Artwork, Miscellaneous Furniture and Household Items and others
Claimant:
Deborah Boice Hoover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Zulu v. Seymour et al
as 9:2014cv00870
Plaintiff:
Arkil LionKing Zulu
Defendant:
Wendy M. Seymour, John D. Grant, Gerald Boice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. French et al
as 9:2014cv00746
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Johnson
Defendant:
Robert A. French , Don Haug , Gerald Boice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Boice et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv18560
Plaintiff:
Troyann J. Boice and Robert W. Boice
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Boice et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-18560
Plaintiff:
Troyann J. Boice and Robert W. Boice
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Nguyen Pahm v. John A Boice et al
as 5:2013cv01050
Defendant:
John A Boice, Wendy L Boice and Does
Plaintiff:
Nguyen Pahm
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Abreu v. United States of America
as 12-2466
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, State of New York, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and others
Durant v. Landrieu et al
as 1:2013cv01376
Plaintiff:
Timothy Boice-Durant
Defendant:
Mitch Landrieu, Tommy Eschette, Michael Yenni and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
