Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 125
SPENCER v. ECKER et al
as 2:2014cv04128
Petitioner: DELOS D. SPENCER
Respondent: ECKER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BRADFORD and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniel Ager v. Anthony Hedgpeth, et al
as 14-15662
Plaintiff - Appellant: DANIEL AGER, individually and as Successor in Interest to the Estate of Alan Ager, Kathryn Ager and Elizabeth Ager
Defendant - Appellee: ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden, B. HENDRICKS, D. SPENCER and others
Hernandez et al v. Holladay et al
as 4:2014cv00142
Plaintiff: Stephanie Hernandez , Ratha Parr , Megan Harris Halferty and others
Defendant: Charles Holladay , Carl Johnson , Randy Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-55350
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Curry v. Byrne et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv00669
Plaintiff: Kenyatta Curry
Defendant: Thomas E Byrne, Pamela C Derrick, Richard C Bearden, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Morris et al
as 4:2014cv00008
Plaintiff: Lamont D. Spencer
Defendant: Morris, Damore and Norris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2013cv03772
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-57048
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-57037
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Spencer v. Cain
as 2:2013cv05200
Plaintiff: Edmond D. Spencer
Defendant: N. Burl Cain
Respondent: Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?