Cases 61 - 70 of 131
Brown v. Anderson County Sheriff's Office et al (VVV)
as 3:2014cv00487
Plaintiff:
Franklin Eugene Brown
Defendant:
Anderson County Sheriff's Office and Brian Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v Colvin
as 3:2014cv05124
Plaintiff:
Earnest Eugene Brown
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
BROWN vs PORTER et al
as 5:2014cv00336
Plaintiff:
DARRELL EUGENE BROWN
Defendant:
DANIEL PORTER, GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, BRIAN OWENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. USA
as 1:2014cv01403
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Douglas Eugene Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ZUNIGA v. AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE
as 2:2014cv02973
Defendant:
DOES 1-100, KONDAUR CAPITAL CORPORATION, ONE WEST BANK and others
Plaintiff:
ISABEL DASSINGER, MONTELL LOCEY, JILL BROWNING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Brown v. Account Control Technology, Inc.
as 0:2013cv62765
Plaintiff:
Eugene Brown
Defendant:
Account Control Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Brown v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as TXN/3:13-cv-04223
Plaintiff:
Eugene Brown
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Brown v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2013cv04223
Plaintiff:
Eugene Brown
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv02881
Plaintiff:
David Eugene Brown
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Zurich American Insurance Company v. Kingsmore et al
as 3:2013cv01554
Plaintiff:
Zurich American Insurance Company
Defendant:
Danny Kingsmore, Shirley Kingsmore, Thompson Construction Group Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
