Cases 61 - 70 of 124
XODUS MEDICAL INC. et al v. G&T INDUSTRIES
as 2:2017cv01123
Plaintiff:
XODUS MEDICAL INC , ALESSIO PIGAZZI and GLENN KEILAR
Defendant:
G&T INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
T. et al v. HEMPFIELD AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 2:2017cv00811
Plaintiff:
C. T. , B. T. and G. T.
Defendant:
HEMPFIELD AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Staten v. Schneider National Carriers et al
as 2:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
Sandra G T Staten
Defendant:
Schneider National Carriers, Schneider Inc and GEICO Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zimmerman v. Pima County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2016cv00753
Plaintiff:
Troy Darin Zimmerman
Defendant:
Pima County Sheriff's Department, K W Hendrick, G T Salgado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR v. GERATY
as 2:2016mc00316
Petitioner:
BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR
Respondent:
BRENT G T GERATY
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
XODUS MEDICAL INC. et al v. G&T INDUSTRIES
as 2:2016cv05850
Plaintiff:
XODUS MEDICAL INC. , ALESSIO PIGAZZI and GLENN KEILAR
Defendant:
G&T INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv05043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv11263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
K. D., et al v. G. N., et al
as 16-1645
Plaintiff - Appellant:
R. J. N., B. S. N. and K. D., individually and on behalf of R.J.N. and B.S.N., her children
Defendant - Pro Se Appellee:
G. T. N.
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY W. DEBERNARDO, JR., HEIDI DEBERNARDINO-NORTON and DEBERNARDO ANOTNIONO MCCABE DAVIS & DEDIANA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
