Cases 61 - 70 of 144
Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows, et al
as 15-1823
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC.
Defendant:
PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE and MA BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS
Movant - Appellant:
SARAH COLE, FADHAL MOORE, ARJINI KUMARI NAWAL and others
Stout v. Garner Police Department et al
as 5:2015ct03105
Plaintiff:
Thomas Stout, Jr.
Defendant:
Garner Police Department and G.E. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv27604
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Wallace v. General Electric Company et al
as 1:2014cv01224
Plaintiff:
Barry Wallace
Defendant:
General Electric Company and G.E. Appliances
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
BOWENS v. EMPLOYEES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2014cv02689
Plaintiff:
MONTEZ M. BOWENS
Defendant:
EMPLOYEES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN WETEL, KLOPOTOSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jonathan Robinson, et al v. G.E. Money Bank, et al
as 14-15922
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN E. ROBINSON and SALLY J. ROBINSON-BURKE
Defendant - Appellee:
G.E. MONEY BANK, WMC MORTGAGE CORPORATION, WELLS FARGO BANK, NA and others
Johnson v. G.E. Capital Retail Bank
as 6:2014cv00662
Plaintiff:
Deidre Johnson
Defendant:
G.E. Capital Retail Bank
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Struckman v. City of Tukwila et al
as 2:2014cv00547
Plaintiff:
Walter G.E. Struckman
Defendant:
City of Tukwila , Jamie Sturgill, Jane Doe Sturgill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2014cv00537
Plaintiff:
Walter G.E. Struckman, City of Tukwila, Washington, Jamie Sturgill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Combs et al
as 3:2014cv00301
Plaintiff:
Willie Albert Smith
Defendant:
Melanee A. Combs and G.E. Jett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
