Cases 61 - 70 of 662
Rosales v. Watts et al
as 2:2015cv00094
Plaintiff:
Javier Rosales
Defendant:
Harrell Watts, Raymond E. Holt, John V. Flournoy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ford v. Rich et al
as 5:2015cv00319
Plaintiff:
Tony Lenald Ford
Defendant:
Aaron Rich, H. J. Manberry, Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perez v. Watts et al
as 2:2015cv00076
Plaintiff:
Eduardo R. Perez
Defendant:
Harrell Watts, Raymond E. Holt, Suzanne R. Hastings and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Floyd v. Blackmon et al
as 3:2015cv00461
Plaintiff:
Jesse J Floyd
Defendant:
B. E. Blackmon, S. Krause, Skipper Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Derrick Brown v. Scott Holtzapple, et al
as 15-2201
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
ACTING WARDEN SCOTT HOLTZAPPLE, ACTING WARDEN J. BUTLER, CAPTAIN B. TAGGERT and others
Miller v. Walton et al
as 3:2015cv00533
Plaintiff:
Robert Ethan Miller, Jr.
Defendant:
J. S. Walton , Byram , Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lenroy McLean v. Myron Batts, et al
as 15-10410
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LENROY MCLEAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MYRON BATTS, Warden, LOUIS WILLIAMS, III, Assistant Warden, FNU BARTLETT, Captain and others
Sirica Bumpus v. Harrell Watts, et al
as 15-11846
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SIRICA BUMPUS
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRELL WATTS, administrator for national inmate appeals, G. DUNCAN, a unit manager, WARDEN and others
Kirk Loney v. US
as 15-6601
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIRK L. LONEY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COFFEY, I.S.M., MOORE, C.C.M. and others
Defendant:
UNKNOWN, Staff for F.C.C. Petersburg Medium and UNKNOWN, Officials for Petersburg, Virginia U.S.P.S., sued in their individual capacities
Brown v. Holtzapple et al
as 3:2015cv00711
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lakeith Brown
Defendant:
Scott Holtzapple, J. Butler, B. Trate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
