Cases 61 - 70 of 960
Minden Pictures, Inc. v. Hopper (USA), Inc.
as 1:2023cv11340
Plaintiff:
Minden Pictures, Inc.
Defendant:
Hopper (USA), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
US v. Gerald Hopper
as 23-6684
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GERALD DAMONE HOPPER
Hamby v. Hopper et al
as 3:2023cv00546
Plaintiff:
William D. Hamby, Jr.
Defendant:
Allison Hopper, Robert Beham, Jessica Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benjamin Hopper v. United States
as 23-2569
Petitioner:
Benjamin Hopper
Respondent:
United States of America
Frank Douglas Hall et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01745
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Douglas Hall, Christopher Alphonse Jones, Dennis Edward Holladay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Hooper v. Montana Department of Corrections
as 6:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
Matthew D. Hopper and Matthew D. Hooper
Defendant:
Montana Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopper et al v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
David Hopper and Ethan Hopper
Defendant:
USAA Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Hopper et al v. ENPRO INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 1:2023cv01084
Plaintiff:
David Hopper and BECKY HOPPER
Defendant:
ENPRO INDUSTRIES, INC.
Not Classified By Court:
Mike Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
