Cases 61 - 70 of 196
RHODES v. FLEMING et al
as 1:2015cv01067
Respondent:
ZAKI ALI, CINDY BABB, CITY OF KOKOMO and others
Petitioner:
TRACEY RHODES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BUSTILLO v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2015cv00184
Defendant:
E. BRAZZELL, CHARLES DANIELS, R. KANADY and others
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO BUSTILLO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Herbert Andrew v. US
as 15-1515
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HERBERT ALLEN ANDREW, JAMES P. APLINGTON, KENNETH W. FRASER and others
Plaintiff:
JACK C. DIXON, ESTATE OF BENJAMIN F. FORTUNE, N. CLAYTON LEE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Phyllis May v. City of Nahunta, Georgia, et al
as 15-11749
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHYLLIS J. MAY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF NAHUNTA, GEORGIA, DARREN CREWS and TOMMY L. ALLEN
Murphy et al v. Banks et al
as 1:2015cv00033
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ryan Murphy, J Murphy, Chelsey Penix and others
Defendant:
Banks, Budnick, Faust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May v. Owens
as 2:2015cv02018
Plaintiff:
Blake J May
Defendant:
Chris Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackfeather v. Vaher, et al
as 14-1401
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICAH JAMES BLACKFEATHER
Defendant - Appellee:
KAIRI VAHER, WILLIAM J. MAY, COLORADO MENTAL HEALTH INSTITUTE AT PUEBLO and others
Blackfeather v. Vaher et al
as 1:2014cv02341
Plaintiff:
Micah Blackfeather
Defendant:
Kairi Vaher, William J. May, Colorado Mental Health Institute at Pueblo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Brown et al
as 3:2014cv01194
Plaintiff:
Vester Williams
Defendant:
Timothy E. Brown and William J. May, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackfeather v. Boulder County Jail, et al
as 1:2014cv01762
Petitioner:
Micah James Blackfeather
Respondent:
Boulder County Jail, Colorado Mental Health Institution, Boulder County Courts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
