Cases 61 - 70 of 139
Jorge Perez v. Performance Food Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00357
Plaintiff:
Jorge Perez
Defendant:
Performance Food Group, Inc and DOES 1-10
Petitioner:
Jorge Perez, -
Respondent:
Performance Food Group Inc, Vistar Transportation, LLC and Roma Food Enterprises, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Performance Food Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
SANCHEZ MENA et al v. SEASON TEPPANYAKI BUFFET LLC
as 8:2016cv02701
Plaintiff:
HIRAM SANCHEZ MENA , JORGE PEREZ ORDONEZ and SANTOS PEDRO OXLAJ GOMEZ
Defendant:
SEASON TEPPANYAKI BUFFET LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jorge Perez Perez v. USA
as 3:2016cv00149
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jorge Perez Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Perez et al v. Il Cafe Latte Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01696
Plaintiff:
Jorge Perez , Federico Baten Ramirez and Cira Canada Florida
Defendant:
Il Cafe Latte Inc. , Young Hee Han and Pablo Doe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Bluestem Brands, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00156
Plaintiff:
Jorge Perez
Defendant:
Bluestem Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Perez v. Garcia et al
as 4:2016cv00081
Plaintiff:
Jorge Perez
Defendant:
Jesus Garcia , Reynaldo Vasquez and William Throckmorton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez-Robles v. United States of America
as 5:2016hc02024
Petitioner:
Jorge Perez-Robles
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Perez-Robles v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00128
Petitioner:
Jorge Perez-Robles
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Perez-Carbajal v. Stone
as 3:2015cv00083
Petitioner:
Jorge Perez-Carbajal
Respondent:
Stacey N. Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Perez v. Lake
as 4:2015cv00253
Petitioner:
Jorge Perez
Defendant:
S Lake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
