Cases 61 - 70 of 7,591
Anthony Gardner, Jr. v. Kenyatta Momon
as 24-1424
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LAMONT GARDNER, JR.
Defendant:
KENYATTA MOMON, in his individual and official capacity as a member of the Fairfax County Police Department, THOMAS ARMEL, in his individual and official capacity as a member of the Fairfax County Police Department and COUNTY OF FAIRFAX
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hamilton, Kevin L. v. Ardon et al
as 2:2024cv14149
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamont Hamilton
Defendant:
Tony Ardon, Tyler Ludlow and Sheriff William D. Snyder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00854
Plaintiff:
Lamont White
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Markos v. Dirty South Tours, LLC
as 1:2024cv02065
Plaintiff:
Steven LaMont Markos
Defendant:
Dirty South Tours, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Cutner v. Dasant et al
as 6:2024cv01584
Plaintiff:
Lamont Cutner
Defendant:
Lieutenant Nike Dasant and Esther Labrador
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Mayfield v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv02216
Plaintiff:
Shunte Lamont Mayfield
Defendant:
Thomas Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SMITH v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv02353
Plaintiff:
LAMONT A SMITH
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dennis v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Paris Lamont Dennis
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
