Cases 61 - 70 of 70
BOYD v. SECURITAS SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2011cv00452
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BOYD
Defendant:
SECURITAS SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jenkins v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv00125
Petitioner:
Michael Boyd Jenkins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
USA v. Michael Wheat
as 09-6547
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL BOYD WHEAT
Boyd v. Baker
as 3:2009cv02202
Plaintiff:
Michael Boyd
Defendant:
Jaimie Baker
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Boyd v. Talley et al
as 4:2009cv00043
Plaintiff:
Michael Boyd
Defendant:
Sheri Talley, Keith Seidel, Ms. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMALL v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv75605
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BOYD SMALL
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Boyd et al v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2008cv00247
Plaintiff:
Michael Boyd, Robin Taylor and Wendell Andrews
Defendant:
The United States of America, Michael B. Mukasey, Preston Pete Green and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Fuller v. Conway et al
as 1:2008cv00605
Plaintiff:
Sterling Trent Fuller
Defendant:
R. L. Butch Conway, John or Jane Doe, Michael Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821 Default of Loan by Promissary Note
Myers et al v. Bayer CropScience LP
as 4:2007cv00319
Plaintiff:
Michael Boyd Myers, Michael Boyd Myers, Michael Boyd Myers and others
Defendant:
Bayer CropScience LP, Bayer CropScience LP, Bayer CropScience LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
