Cases 61 - 70 of 164
In re: Richard Young
as 14-4783
Petitioner:
In re: RICHARD YOUNG
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LACKAWANNA COUNTY
HERZ v. PFENNINGER et al
as 1:2014cv02001
Defendant:
GREGORY BALLARD, SUSAN BROOKS, MICHAEL DELPH and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Young v. USA
as 3:2014cv00546
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Richard Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Shane Hardy v. Stanley Caradine, et al
as 14-2900
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHANE HARDY
Defendant - Appellee:
STANLEY CARADINE, Doctor, Former Dentist, Western Illinois Correctional Center, LEONTA JACKSON, Warden, Former Warden, Western Illinois Correctional Center, RICHARD YOUNG, Warden, Former Warden, Western Illinois Correctional Center and others
VAUGH v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2014cv04982
Plaintiff:
ANDREW VAUGH
Defendant:
RICHARD YOUNG and UNLIMITED ROOFING AND CONCRETE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv18618
Plaintiff:
Glory Young and Richard Young
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARK MCCLESKEY et al v. RICHARD YOUNG
as 1:2014cv00620
Plaintiff:
INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS and MARK MCCLESKEY
Defendant:
RICHARD YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Kamondai v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2014cv00686
Petitioner:
Kamondai Richard Young
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kamondai v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2014cv00733
Petitioner:
Richard Young Kamondai
Respondent:
Arizona, State of and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rocquemore v. Godinez et al
as 3:2013cv01261
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Rocquemore
Defendant:
S A Godinez, Wendy Blank, Richard Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
