Cases 61 - 70 of 211
Brandon v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2018cv01137
Plaintiff:
Fabian Brandon
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Marcus Hardy, Michael P Melvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogelio Orozco v. Kim Butler, et al
as 18-1635
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGELIO OROZCO
Defendant - Appellee:
KIM BUTLER, MINN T. SCOTT, REBECCA COWAN and others
SMITH v. STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv00076
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. SMITH
Defendant:
STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC. , JOHN D. LAPEY , MICHAEL P. HALEY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
United States of America v. Barbara T. Scott
as 2:2018cv00440
Defendant:
Barbara T Scott
Plaintiff:
United States of America
AULTMAN v. FORD et al
as 1:2017cv00211
Plaintiff:
JAY DENNIS AULTMAN
Defendant:
BENJAMIN FORD, CHRISTINE CROSS, RUSSELL HOLLMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giancola et al v. Lincare Holdings, Inc.
as 8:2017cv02427
Plaintiff:
Andrew Giancola , Raymond T. Scott and Patricia Smith
Defendant:
Lincare Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fd Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Curtis v. Trump et al
as 8:2017cv02345
Plaintiff:
Alan Boyd Curtis
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, United States, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEVY v. MITCHELL et al
as 1:2017cv03090
Defendant:
JOHN DOE (1), JOHN DOE (2), T. SCOTT HUNT and others
Plaintiff:
GAI LEVY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Washington County Detention Center
as 2:2017cv00147
Plaintiff:
Darren T Scott
Defendant:
Washington County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reilly v. Legendary Journeys, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv01524
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Rondinelli Reilly
Defendant:
Legendary Journeys, Inc., Adrian L. Ferguson, Jr. and Charles T. Scott
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
