Cases 61 - 70 of 21,832
Doucet v. Mancuso et al
as 2:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Daniel Paul Doucet
Defendant:
Tony Mancuso, Keithen Breaux, Cameron Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
George M. Churchill et al v. Warner Bros et al
as 2:2024cv02030
Plaintiff:
George M. Churchill and Katherine Kanter
Defendant:
Warner Bros, New Line Productions, Inc., Plan B Entertainment and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Warner v. Amgen Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv10632
Plaintiff:
Elissa M Warner
Defendant:
Amgen Inc., Amgen USA, Inc., NOVARTIS INSTITUTES for BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Blake Warner v. Hillsborough County Clerk of Courts
as 24-10748
Plaintiff:
BLAKE WARNER
Defendant:
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS
Peter Seamon v. Governor Joshua Shapiro, et al
as 24-1451
Plaintiff:
PETER R. SEAMON
Defendant:
GOVERNOR JOSHUA D. SHAPIRO, NANCY WALKER, Secretary of Labor & Industry, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY and others
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Full Throttle Roadhouse LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01050
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., Blackened Music, Dandelion Music Co. and others
Defendant:
Full Throttle Roadhouse LLC doing business as Full Throttle Roadhouse, Randy Snyder and Elizabeth Snyder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Norris Pegues v. Karl Hoffman, et al
as 24-1366
Plaintiff:
NORRIS E. PEGUES
Defendant:
KARL HOFFMAN, Doctor, LYNN DOBBERT and CANDACE WARNER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
