Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 101,958
DeCava v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv01446
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff: Eric T. DeCava
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Penwell v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv05748
Defendant: Cheryl Strange, Krissy Rygg, Eric Jackson and others
Plaintiff: Tony Penwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00441
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
MONTGOMERY v. DIXON We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2024cv61642
Plaintiff: ERIC MONTGOMERY
Defendant: RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mamedov et al v. Walters et al
as 1:2024cv03970
Plaintiff: Raushan R. Mamedov and Zarima Aliyeva
Defendant: Montgomery Transport, LLC, Eric Walters and MKM Leasing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Boards v. Musson et al
as 3:2024cv00746
Defendant: Joshua Carey, Ryan Musson, Dylan Frost and others
Plaintiff: Carl R Webb II Boards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KHAN
as 3:2024cv08976
Plaintiff: ERIC KHAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boatman v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00318
Plaintiff: Richard Eric Boatman
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rodriguez v. USA
as 3:2024cv02278
Petitioner: Eric Rodriguez
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Johnson v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission et al
as 1:2024cv00319
Defendant: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Eric J. Young and Michael H. Hurwitz
Plaintiff: Robert W Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?