Cases 71 - 80 of 3,273
US v. Tanner Larch
as 24-6331
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TANNER MOREN EAGLE LARCH
TANNER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv02957
Plaintiff:
DEANNA TANNER
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TANNER v. FRENCH et al
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO TARODD TANNER
Defendant:
FRENCH, DIRECTOR CURRY, SKKRUBS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, G. LETTLE, G. LITTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Drake v. FedEx Ground Package System Inc
as 3:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System Inc, Molly Smith, Arthur William Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Pritchett et al v. United Parcel Services Inc
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Cain Pritchett, Micheal Arnold, Bradley Barkley and others
Defendant:
United Parcel Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Curtis, et al. v. Inslee, et al.
as 24-1869
Plaintiff:
AILA CURTIS, CIERA AGEE, ALISON ARCHER and others
Defendant:
JAY ROBERT INSLEE, PEACEHEALTH, LIZ DUNNE and others
DAVIS v. HASSAN et al
as 1:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
TANNER DAVIS
Defendant:
AHMED HASSAN, STATES TRANSPORTATION and STATES TRANSPORTATION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
BALZORA v. BALATGEK et al
as 5:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
SANDRO BALZARO and SANDRO PATRICK BALZORA
Defendant:
OFFICER KALIA BALAGTEK, OFFICER TANNER, CITY OF ALLENTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
