Cases 71 - 80 of 17,108
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1652
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
MINDY POSOFF, Managing Director, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and others
Bey v. Carter-Haston et al
as 3:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Hanif Rahim Bey
Defendant:
Carter-Haston, Brownlee Whitlow & Praet, L. Marc Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simpson v. Corizon Health Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv10996
Plaintiff:
Jimmie L. Simpson
Defendant:
Corizon Health Inc., WellPath Health Inc., James Blessman and others
Dorazio v. Reyes et al
as 3:2024cv00644
Plaintiff:
William Dorazio
Defendant:
Erin Reyes, C. Dieter, Dr. Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Marcus Wright
as 24-11155
Petitioner:
In re: MARCUS WRIGHT
Respondent:
USP COLEMAN II WARDEN and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Coleman, et al. v. Newsom, et al.
as 24-2263
Plaintiff:
RALPH COLEMAN, JORGE ANDRADE RICO, PETER COCKCROFT and others
Defendant:
GAVIN NEWSOM, JEFF MACOMBER, JOE STEPHENSHAW and others
Murphy v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv10945
Plaintiff:
Timothy Murphy
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Jong Choi, Rickey Coleman and others
Miller v. Dunn et al
as 3:2024cv00889
Plaintiff:
Bradley B Miller
Defendant:
Virginia Talley Dunn, The Hockaday School, Laura Leathers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Alphonso Tanner v. French, et al
as 24-11098
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO TARODD TANNER
Defendant:
FRENCH, CURRY, SKKRUBS and others
Seguin v. Rhode Island Department of Human Services, et al
as 24-1313
Plaintiff:
MARY SEGUIN
Defendant:
RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, in its official capacity, RHODE ISLAND OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES, in its official capacity, GERO MEYERSIEK, in his individual and official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
