Cases 71 - 80 of 549
Brunson v. Adams, et al
as 22-4007
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RALAND BRUNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ALMA S. ADAMS, in their capacity as United States House Representatives, PETE AGUILAR, in their capacity as United States House Representatives, COLIN Z. ALLRED, in their capacity as United States House Representatives and others
France v. Hardee et al
as 5:2022ct03055
Plaintiff:
William France
Defendant:
Michael Hardee, Commissioner of Pris Todd Ishee, FNU Hendricks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blunt #252203 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv00013
Plaintiff:
James A. Blunt #252203
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Chippewa Correctional Facility, R. Batho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blunt v. Lyft, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Chastity Blunt
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc. and Indian Harbor Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blunt v. Precythe et al
as 4:2021cv00830
Plaintiff:
Timothy Javon Blunt
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe and CCW Ryan Crews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Guyton et al
as 1:2021cv01337
Plaintiff:
Corey Brooks
Defendant:
Ronda Guyton, . Turner, . Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLUNT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv02328
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL BLUNT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blunt #252203 v. Gleason
as 1:2021cv00924
Plaintiff:
James A. Blunt #252203
Defendant:
Michael Gleason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLUNT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv60696
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL BLUNT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BLUNT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv55017
Plaintiff:
CHARLEY SHANNON BLUNT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
