Cases 71 - 80 of 554
Nathan Crisp v. The State of Georgia, et al
as 21-14190
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SERGEANT NATHAN D. CRISP
Defendant / Appellee:
THE STATE OF GEORGIA, GWINNETT COUNTY, MS. TOOLE, Gwinnett County Assistant District Attorney and others
CRISP v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv03262
Plaintiff:
JASON CRISP
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CRISP v. RAMOS
as 1:2021cv00821
Petitioner:
PATRICK LEROY CRISP
Respondent:
MR. RAMOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Crisp Marketing, LLC
as 0:2021cv62192
Plaintiff:
Sandra Smith
Defendant:
Crisp Marketing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Crisp v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2021cv12314
Plaintiff:
Brenda Crisp
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Endo-Surgery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sims v. Nacogdoches County, Texas et al
as 9:2021cv00251
Plaintiff:
Demetri Sims
Defendant:
Nacogdoches County, Texas, Unidentified Officer, Deputy Tyler Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CRISP v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv55347
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CRISP
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crandall Postell v. Crisp County School District, et al
as 21-13268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRANDALL POSTELL
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MATHEW WHITEST and CURTIS LUCAS
Defendant / Appellee:
CRISP COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, BECKY PERKINS, in her official capacity as Elections' Supervisor of the Crisp County Board of Elections and Re, JUSTIN POSEY, in his official capacity as a member of the Crisp County Board of Education and others
Jett v. Crisp et al
as 1:2021cv03439
Plaintiff:
Douglas M. Jett
Defendant:
Eric J. Crisp, Crisp & Crisp Hauling, LLC, Owners Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
