Cases 71 - 80 of 30,814
Elia v. Garland
as 1:2024cv03947
Petitioner:
Dr. Souheil E. Elia
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Goldfeder v. Williams,DO et al
as 9:2024cv80407
Plaintiff:
MD Bruce Wayne Goldfeder
Defendant:
Dr Ronald K. Williams,DO, United States, Cory P. Price and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00056
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Keith Brown v. Mary Monsalud, et al
as 24-1555
Plaintiff:
KEITH STANLEY BROWN
Defendant:
DR. MARY JOY MONSALUD, DR. NEWTON and KAREN HOLLY
Albury-Gaffney v. Levine
as 2:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Selena L. Albury-Gaffney
Defendant:
Dr. Mathew Levine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1338
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, individual capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individual capacity and others
Red Dragon Partners, LLC v. TruthMD, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
Red Dragon Partners, LLC
Defendant:
TruthMD, LLC, Gemma Cunningham, Dr. Charles D. Rosen and others
Abdeljaber v. Department of Justice et al
as 8:2024cv01315
Plaintiff:
Ali Odeh Abdeljaber
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Collette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Holmes v. Grant et al
as 4:2024cv03255
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Jacob Holmes
Defendant:
Quandara Grant, Dana Aiken, Major Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Archer v. Saunder et al
as 1:2024cv00941
Plaintiff:
Susan Michelle Archer
Defendant:
NP Saunder, Nurse Rose and DR Moreno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
