Cases 71 - 80 of 104
Abreu v. Farley
as 11-3533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric Farley, Correction Officer at Five Points Correctional Facility, Kyler Kennedy, Correction Officer at Five Points Correctional Facility, Barry Countryman, Correction Officer at Five Points Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Abreu v. Farley, et al.
as 6:2011cv06251
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
Eric Farley, Robert Maloy, Kyler Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale et al v. First American Title Insurance et al
as 2:2011cv00398
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Hale and Deborah Hale
Defendant:
First American Title Insurance , Bank of America NA and MERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Hale et al
as 3:2011mc00044
Petitioner:
USA
Respondent:
Stevie M. Hale and Linda J. Hale
USA v. Hale et al
as 3:2011mc00045
Petitioner:
USA
Respondent:
Steve M. Hale and Linda J. Hale
Carlwood Development, Inc. et al vs USA
as 2:2010cv01773
Petitioner:
Carol J. Ager, Carolin I. Ager, Charlton S. Ager and others
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Hale v. Northstar Location Services, LLC
as 5:2010cv04473
Plaintiff:
Bonnie J Hale
Defendant:
Northstar Location Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hale, et al v. Browne, et al
as 10-3899
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ELAINE HALE, Individually and as Administratix of the Estate of Derek J. Hale, DENNIS W. HALE and CONNIE M. HALE
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM BROWNE, CITY OF WILMINGTON, a municipal corporation, RANDOLPH PFAFF and others
Defendant - Appellant:
PATRICK OGDEN
Hale v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 3:2010cv00281
Plaintiff:
Kristi J Hale
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
