Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 187
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03842
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00847
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv01097
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v. United States Postal Service et al
as 5:2010cv01098
Plaintiff: Martricia Chapman
Defendant: United States Postal Service and John Potter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1569
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00425
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-40364
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00635
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Floyd, et al v. Zavaras, et al
as 10-1106
Plaintiff - Appellee: KENNETH FLOYD, ERNEST L. WALKER, HAROLD TURMAN and others
Defendant - Appellee: ARISTEDES ZAVARAS, Executive Director of the Department of Corrections and COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Interested Party - Appellant: JUSTIN JOSEPH RUEB
Hollman v. TLC The Laser Eye Center Institute Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2010cv00685
Plaintiff: John Hollman
Defendant: TLC The Laser Eye Center Institute Inc, TLC The Laser Center Carolina Inc, TLC The Laser Center Madison Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?