Cases 71 - 80 of 135
Lewis v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2015cv01630
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lewis
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, CT Dept. of Correction, Robert Saraco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP et al
as 2:2015cv05334
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LEWIS
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP and WALMART STORE #2650
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lewis et al v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00318
Plaintiff:
Otto Barrera, Clyde Carter, Ricky D. Davis and others
Unknown:
Jeffrey Dubner, Jeffrey Dubner, Jeffrey Dubner and others
Defendant:
Burl Cain, Stephanie Lamartiniere, James LeBlanc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEWIS et al v. WEIR et al
as 1:2014cv01746
Plaintiff:
L. B., TIFFANY BLACKFORD and JOSEPH LEWIS
Defendant:
MARY BETH BONAVENTURA, LARRY VAN BRIGGLE and JEANETTA WEIR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01683
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
DAVIS et al v. SARLES et al
as 1:2014cv01389
Plaintiff:
JUDY DAVIS, ZURI DAVIS, SOLOMON DAVIS and others
Defendant:
RICHARD SARLES , WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY , COLIN DORRITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Randall Rolle v. Nikki Clark, et al
as 14-13629
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE
Defendant - Appellee:
NIKKI ANN CLARK, Judge, JOSEPH LEWIS, Judge, SCOTT DOUGLAS MAKAR, Judge and others
LEWIS v. WITTE
as 1:2014cv01129
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LEWIS
Defendant:
G. MICHAEL WITTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROLLE v. CLARK et al
as 4:2014cv00350
Plaintiff:
RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE
Defendant:
NIKKI ANN CLARK, JOSEPH LEWIS, SCOTT DOUGLAS MAKAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2014cv00621
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lewis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
