Cases 71 - 80 of 114
Campbell #657762 v. Palmer
as 1:2010cv00417
Petitioner:
Michael D. Campbell #657762
Respondent:
Carmen Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Campbell v. Workman
as 10-6084
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL A. CAMPBELL
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDALL WORKMAN, Warden
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CAMPBELL
as 2:2010cv01222
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICHAEL STONE CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Charles Clayton v. Christine Lancia, et al
as 10-5292
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES CLAYTON
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL G. CAMPBELL, et al.
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTINE A. LANCIA, RANDALL S. PITCHER and DONALD M. CAMPBELL, Major General
Zingale et al v. 400 Food Terminal Employees' Pension Fund et al
as 1:2009cv02769
Plaintiff:
Salvatore C. Zingale, Salvatore C. Zingale, Matthew S. Fritz and others
Defendant:
400 Food Terminal Employees' Pension Fund, Charles A. Cimino, Jr., John A. Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Cleverley v. Campbell
as 3:2009cv05663
Plaintiff:
Matthew Cleverley
Defendant:
Michael Lane Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Watson v. Hughes et al
as 9:2009cv00172
Plaintiff:
Robert Wayne Watson
Defendant:
Dwayne Hughes, Jimmy A Hutcherson, Michael W Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITE v. LAMAS et al
as 3:2009cv01766
Plaintiff:
Bernadette V. White
Defendant:
Mary Lamas, Mary Lamas, Michael David Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sater Design Collection, Inc., The v. Campbell et al
as 1:2009cv01888
Plaintiff:
Sater Design Collection, Inc., The
Defendant:
Michael G. Campbell and Laura D. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Campbell v. Diame
as 7:2009cv01918
Plaintiff:
Michael Leroy Campbell
Defendant:
Austin Kim Diame
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731 Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
