Cases 71 - 80 of 681
Michael Aguilar v. USDC-AZT
as 22-70207
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MICHAEL EDWARD AGUILAR, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS REHABILITATION AND REENTRY, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Petitioner:
MICHAEL EDWARD AGUILAR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, TUCSON
Ball v. Blanton et al
as 2:2022cv01396
Plaintiff:
Maikiya Christine Ball
Defendant:
Michael Edward Blanton, United States Postal Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
HAYIAS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13801
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL EDWARD HAYIAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BOWEN v. MONNIE et al
as 1:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BOWEN
Defendant:
DEBORAH ANN MONNIE, PATRICK NOSKO, LUKE VOGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv11360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. Michael Lamp, II
as 22-4227
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARD LAMP, II, a/k/a Chubs
Ynostrosa v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00014
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Ynostrosa
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re CIM-SQ Transfer Cases
as 3:2022mc80066
Plaintiff:
Charles Carter, Sr., Robert Lee Cole, Lovell Colvin and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Ron Broomfield, State of California and others
US v. Michael Jones
as 22-6172
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARD JONES
US v. Corey Edwards
as 22-6052
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
COREY MICHAEL EDWARDS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
