Cases 71 - 80 of 732
Iraci v. Bradford et al
as 2:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Iraci
Defendant:
Zachary K. Bradford, Lori L. Love, S. Matthew Schultz and others
Nominal Defendant:
CleanSpark, Inc.
Interested Party:
Andrea Ciceri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
James McNeill v. Monica Bond
as 23-6181
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES C. MCNEILL
Defendant / Appellee:
MONICA BOND
Defendant:
CAMERON GADDY, NICOLAS BUSTILLOS, VIGO and others
Head Kandy LLC v. McNeill
as 0:2023cv60345
Plaintiff:
Head Kandy LLC
Defendant:
Kayla Marie McNeill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Scott v. McNeill et al
as 0:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
Courtney A. Scott
Defendant:
David Lamont McNeill and Lisk Trucking Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
McNeill v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. McNeill
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, North Carolina State Bar, John A. Mandulak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gann v. Victoria County Sheriff's Office
as 6:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Wayne Bernard Gann
Defendant:
Victoria County Sheriff's Office, Captain Charles Williamson, Dr. McNeill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Doe
as 22-3108
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
John Doe, AKA Sealed Defendant, AKA Jimmy Earl McNeill, AKA Michael Gerard Simpson
MCNEILL v. U.S. MARSHALS
as 1:2022cv01044
Plaintiff:
EDDIE LAVON MCNEILL
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeill v. BJ Wholesale
as 1:2022cv03030
Plaintiff:
Cleo McNeill
Defendant:
BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Harrison v. Broch et al
as 2:2022cv02234
Plaintiff:
Lyle Roger Harrison
Defendant:
Richard L Broch, Jeremy R Richey, Cynthia J Braden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
