Cases 71 - 80 of 149
Herbert E. Liverman v. City of Petersburg
as 15-2207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HERBERT E. LIVERMAN and VANCE R. RICHARDS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PETERSBURG and JOHN I. DIXON, III, both individually and in his capacity as the Chief of Police for the City of Petersburg Bureau of Police
Coleman v. Richard
as 3:2015cv01962
Petitioner:
Marcus Coleman
Respondent:
Rhonda R. Richard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RICHARD
as 1:2015cv00344
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOSEPH R RICHARD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
Whitman et al v. Vertical Concrete Walls, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv11537
Plaintiff:
L. D. Whitman and Dorothy Whitman
Defendant:
Vertical Concrete Walls, Inc. and R. Richard Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Manzanales v. Illinois Deptarment of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv01299
Plaintiff:
Pedro Manzanales, Jr
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Pontiac Correctional Center, Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards v. U.S. Steel
as 3:2015cv00646
Plaintiff:
Mary R Richards
Defendant:
U.S. Steel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Farmers Automobile Management Corporation v. Richards et al
as 3:2015cv00231
Plaintiff:
The Farmers Automobile Management Corporation
Defendant:
Savannah R Richards , Sandy Kazmierczak and Doug Kazmierczak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hatton v. Richard
as 2:2015cv01506
Respondent:
Rhonda R. Richard
Petitioner:
Martin L. Hatton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott McCoy v. Rhonda Richard
as 15-3377
Petitioner - Appellant:
SCOTT MCCOY
Respondent - Appellee:
RHONDA R. RICHARD, Warden
Rathjen et al v. Eagle U S 2 L L C et al
as 2:2015cv00729
Plaintiff:
Jackie Rathjen , Jeanette Reado , Jaheishia Reed and others
Defendant:
Eagle U S 2 L L C and David L Ardoin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
